From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Maldonado

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Dec 29, 2021
No. 2021-07558 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2021-07558 Ind. 4506/18 2844/19

12-29-2021

The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Alfredo Maldonado, appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Naila S. Siddiqui of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Terrence F. Heller, and Arieh Schulman of counsel; Yael Golan on the memorandum), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Naila S. Siddiqui of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Terrence F. Heller, and Arieh Schulman of counsel; Yael Golan on the memorandum), for respondent.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P. SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant, (1) as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Joanne D. Quinones, J.), imposed August 16, 2019, under Indictment No. 2844/19, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive, and (2) from a judgment of the same court rendered August 16, 2019, convicting him of menacing in the third degree under Indictment No. 4506/18, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 U.S. 738), with respect to the appeal from the judgment rendered under Indictment No. 4506/18, in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the sentence imposed under Indictment No. 2844/19 is affirmed; and it is further, ORDERED that the judgment rendered under Indictment No. 4506/18 is affirmed.

The sentence imposed under Indictment No. 2844/19 was not excessive (see CPL 470.15[6][b]; People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

With respect to the appeal from the judgment rendered under Indictment No. 4506/18, we are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 U.S. 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues that could be raised on the appeal from that judgment. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d 252).

MASTRO, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BRATHWAITE NELSON and GENOVESI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Maldonado

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Dec 29, 2021
No. 2021-07558 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 29, 2021)
Case details for

People v. Maldonado

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Alfredo Maldonado…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Dec 29, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-07558 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 29, 2021)