Here, the brief submitted by the appellant's counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 is deficient because it fails to adequately analyze potentially nonfrivolous appellate issues. Moreover, upon this Court's independent review of the record, we conclude that nonfrivolous issues exist, including, but not necessarily limited to, whether the appellant's guilty plea was jurisdictionally defective (see CPL 220.10 ; People v. Maldonado, 192 A.D.3d 462, 139 N.Y.S.3d 815 ). Accordingly, the assignment of new counsel is warranted.

Moreover, upon this Court's independent review of the record, we conclude that nonfrivolous issues exist, including, but not necessarily limited to, whether the appellant's guilty plea was jurisdictionally defective (see CPL 220.10; People v Maldonado, 192 A.D.3d 462). Accordingly, the assignment of new counsel is warranted.

Moreover, upon this Court's independent review of the record, we conclude that nonfrivolous issues exist, including, but not necessarily limited to, whether the appellant's guilty plea was jurisdictionally defective (see CPL 220.10; People v Maldonado, 192 A.D.3d 462). Accordingly, the assignment of new counsel is warranted.

Here, the brief submitted by the appellant's counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 U.S. 738) is deficient because it fails to adequately analyze potentially nonfrivolous appellate issues. Moreover, upon this Court's independent review of the record, we conclude that nonfrivolous issues exist, including, but not necessarily limited to, whether the appellant's guilty plea was jurisdictionally defective (see CPL 220.10; People v Maldonado, 192 A.D.3d 462).

Moreover, upon this Court's independent review of the record, we conclude that nonfrivolous issues exist, including, but not necessarily limited to, whether the appellant's guilty plea was jurisdictionally defective (see CPL 220.10; People v Maldonado, 192 A.D.3d 462). Accordingly, the assignment of new counsel is warranted.