From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Makley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 11, 1994
202 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 11, 1994

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Egan, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Balio, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court erred in refusing to permit him to rehabilitate his witness with evidence of a prior consistent statement made before trial. Defendant alleges that the District Attorney attacked the witness' testimony as a recent fabrication. Because the prior consistent statement did not antedate the motive to fabricate, County Court properly concluded that it was inadmissible (see, People v. McClean, 69 N.Y.2d 426, 428-430; People v. Davis, 44 N.Y.2d 269, 277-278; People v. Williams, 139 A.D.2d 683, 683-684).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Makley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 11, 1994
202 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Makley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LAWRENCE MAKLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 509