From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Madison

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 28, 2019
172 A.D.3d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9427– 9427A– 9427B Ind. 665/15 2046/15 3487/15

05-28-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Horace MADISON, Defendant–Appellant.

Christina A. Swarns, Office of The Appellate Defender, New York (Amanda Rolat of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Luis Morales of counsel), for respondent.


Christina A. Swarns, Office of The Appellate Defender, New York (Amanda Rolat of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Luis Morales of counsel), for respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Gische, Tom, Webber, Gesmer, JJ.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen Biben, J. at plea and sentencing), rendered April 19, 2016,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Madison

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 28, 2019
172 A.D.3d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Madison

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Horace Madison…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 28, 2019

Citations

172 A.D.3d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
172 A.D.3d 606
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 4096

Citing Cases

Mitcham v. Honorable Miriam Breier J.H.C.

The manner in which motions should be brought before the Court during the continuing Covid-19 emergency was…

Kahn v. City of New York

Respondent is not prohibited from considering the past discontinuance of petitioner's probation in assessing…