From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1985
111 A.D.2d 266 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

May 13, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Defendant claims that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. Some of the occurrences he now objects to were matters of unsuccessful trial strategy, including counsel's eliciting the details of complainant's injuries and his decision not to contact the person in whose possession the murder weapon was found. There is insufficient information in the record to determine whether counsel attempted to contact another potential witness; therefore, this court cannot pass on whether he failed to do so, or whether it would be a ground to support a finding of ineffective assistance of counsel. Other errors raised by defendant with respect to counsel's performance were not of a serious nature. Neither the Federal nor the New York State Constitution requires perfect trials, but only fair ones ( People v. Morris, 100 A.D.2d 630, affd 64 N.Y.2d 803; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137; Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S Ct 2052). Defendant has failed to demonstrate that counsel's errors resulted in prejudice or denied him a fair trial. Therefore, we see no reason to overturn his conviction.

Defendant's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit. Titone, J.P., Thompson, O'Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1985
111 A.D.2d 266 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Mack

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CORNELL MACK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 13, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 266 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Sinatra

Some of the occurrences to which he now objects were matters of unsuccessful trial strategy, including…

People v. Ogilvie

He argues that somehow this testimony concerning the victim's mental health was so prejudicial to him that…