From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mack

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jul 31, 2019
174 A.D.3d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

1995–05777 Ind.No. 3486/94

07-31-2019

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Ronald MACK, Appellant.

Ronald Mack, Elmira, NY, appellant pro se. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Anthea H. Bruffee of counsel), for respondent.


Ronald Mack, Elmira, NY, appellant pro se.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Anthea H. Bruffee of counsel), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., SHERI S. ROMAN, JEFFREY A. COHEN, ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 8, 1999 ( People v. Mack, 258 A.D.2d 534, 683 N.Y.S.2d 885 ), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 1, 1995.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987 ; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883 ).

RIVERA, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mack

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jul 31, 2019
174 A.D.3d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Mack

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Ronald Mack, appellant.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jul 31, 2019

Citations

174 A.D.3d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
174 A.D.3d 922
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 5999