From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lynch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2003
309 A.D.2d 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-08863

Argued September 23, 2003.

October 20, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Rosenwasser, J.), rendered September 20, 2002, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Gary Greenwald, Chester, N.Y. (Marie DuSault of counsel), for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, Goshen, N.Y. (Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

The evidence at trial established that the defendant was present in a house where a burglary occurred on the day that money was stolen, but there was no direct evidence establishing the identity of the burglar. In its charge to the jury, the trial court failed to inform the jury that the evidence presented to establish the defendant's guilt was solely circumstantial. Accordingly, the jury was not aware of its duty to apply the circumstantial evidence standard to the People's entire case ( see People v. Sanchez, 61 N.Y.2d 1022). Further, the evidence of the defendant's guilt was less than overwhelming, precluding the conclusion that the failure to give the proper charge was harmless error ( see People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230). Therefore, the defendant is entitled to a new trial.

Additionally, the trial court erred in allowing the prosecutor to question the defendant's father regarding whether the defendant ever denied that he was identified as the person seen in the victim's house on the day of the burglary ( see People v. Lewis, 69 N.Y.2d 321).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, McGINITY and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lynch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2003
309 A.D.2d 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. BRIAN LYNCH, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 60

Citing Cases

People v. James

.2d 647, 968 N.E.2d 1003 [2012] ), a defendant's mere presence at the scene of the crime in close temporal…

People v. Carter

Here, the trial court should have given the charge because the People's case rested wholly on circumstantial…