People v. Ly

Full title: THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HUNG THIEU LY et al., Defendants…

Court: California Court of Appeals, Third District, Sacramento

Date published: Oct 22, 2008

No. C052280 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 22, 2008)

Opinion

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HUNG THIEU LY et al., Defendants and Appellants. C052280 California Court of Appeal, Third District, Sacramento October 22, 2008

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Super. Ct. No. 04F00144

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed in this case on September 23, 2008, be modified as follows:

1. At page 19 of the opinion, delete the second full paragraph, which begins “Defendants are precluded from raising this argument”.

2. Also at page 19 of the opinion, delete the following from the beginning of the third full paragraph: “In any event,” so the first sentence of the paragraph reads: “Woods does not support defendants’ assertion that the trial court was obligated to give the augmentation.”

There is no change in the judgment.

The petitions for rehearing of codefendants Nicole Carroll, John Dich, Chan Vehn (John) Lam, and, by joinder, Jimmy Chi Cooc are denied.

SCOTLAND, P. J., HULL, J., BUTZ, J.