From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lutchmidat

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 2, 1987
134 A.D.2d 286 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

November 2, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Our review of the record indicates that the evidence adduced at the trial was sufficient to disprove the defendant's justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. The issue of justification came down to a question of credibility which the court obviously resolved in favor of the People (see, People v Resnick, 133 A.D.2d 237).

Under the circumstances of this case, where the defendant fatally stabbed an 18-year-old man, we find that the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to adjudicate the defendant a youthful offender (see, People v. Belsito, 130 A.D.2d 583). Furthermore, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 85-86).

The defendant's remaining contentions, that he was denied a fair trial due to the conduct of the prosecutor and Trial Judge, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Lawrence and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lutchmidat

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 2, 1987
134 A.D.2d 286 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Lutchmidat

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PARMANAND LUTCHMIDAT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 2, 1987

Citations

134 A.D.2d 286 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Madera

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the transcript of the sentencing proceedings reveals that the court…

People v. Jackson

However, with respect to the remaining counts of the indictment, when viewed in the light most favorable to…