From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lurch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 27, 2019
173 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9772 Ind. 791N/16

06-27-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rasheen LURCH, Defendant–Appellant.

Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.


Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Singh, JJ.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Abraham Clott, J.), rendered August 3, 2016,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Lurch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 27, 2019
173 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Lurch

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rasheen Lurch…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 27, 2019

Citations

173 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
173 A.D.3d 641
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 5219

Citing Cases

Bennigson v. The Solomon R. Guggenheim Found.

At bottom, the AC is predicated on the theory that sales of artwork by Jews fleeing Nazi Germany to anyone…

Shchukin House OU v. Frolova

The motion court correctly ruled that this proceeding is barred by the doctrine of res judicata (see Thomas v…