Opinion
November 30, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Farlo, J.).
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). The contention raised in the defendant's supplemental pro se brief has already been determined to be without merit (see, People v Lupo, 179 A.D.2d 683). Thompson, J.P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.