From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lundmark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 11, 1991
170 A.D.2d 539 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

February 11, 1991

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.).


Ordered that the judgment and the amended judgment are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lundmark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 11, 1991
170 A.D.2d 539 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Lundmark

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LORRAINE LUNDMARK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 11, 1991

Citations

170 A.D.2d 539 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)