From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lumpkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 28, 2021
190 A.D.3d 1195 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

111538

01-28-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Quadeer LUMPKIN, Appellant.

G. Scott Walling, Slingerlands, for appellant. Gary M. Pasqua, District Attorney, Canton (Matthew L. Peabody of counsel), for respondent.


G. Scott Walling, Slingerlands, for appellant.

Gary M. Pasqua, District Attorney, Canton (Matthew L. Peabody of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Clark and Colangelo, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), rendered July 15, 2019, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. Pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement, defendant waived his right to appeal and executed a written waiver in open court. County Court sentenced defendant, as a second felony drug offender, to three years in prison, to be followed by two years of postrelease supervision, with the sentence to run consecutively to any sentence remaining from a prior conviction. Defendant appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that may be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, however, we perceive at least one issue of arguable merit pertaining to inconsistent references to the length of the prison term during the plea colloquy. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the ultimate merit of this issue, we grant counsel's application for leave to withdraw and assign new counsel to address this issue and any others that the record may disclose (see People v. Beaty, 22 N.Y.3d 490, 492–493, 982 N.Y.S.2d 820, 5 N.E.3d 983 [2014] ; People v. Stokes, 95 N.Y.2d 633, 638–639, 722 N.Y.S.2d 217, 744 N.E.2d 1153 [2001] ; People v. Cruwys, 113 A.D.2d 979, 980, 493 N.Y.S.2d 653 [1985], lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 650, 499 N.Y.S.2d 1046, 490 N.E.2d 562 [1986] ).

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Clark and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.


Summaries of

People v. Lumpkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 28, 2021
190 A.D.3d 1195 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Lumpkin

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Quadeer Lumpkin…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 28, 2021

Citations

190 A.D.3d 1195 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
190 A.D.3d 1195
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 460

Citing Cases

People v. Lumpkin

Defendant appeals. When this matter was previously before us, we rejected counsel's Anders brief, withheld…

People v. Lumpkin

Defendant appeals. When this matter was previously before us, we rejected counsel's Anders brief, withheld…