From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lumpkin

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 5, 2019
169 A.D.3d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

8312 Ind. 3526N/16

02-05-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Darryl LUMPKIN, Defendant–Appellant.

Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Katherine Kulkarni of counsel), for respondent.


Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Katherine Kulkarni of counsel), for respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Mazzarelli, Webber, Kern, Oing, JJ.

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Lumpkin

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 5, 2019
169 A.D.3d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Lumpkin

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Darryl LUMPKIN…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 5, 2019

Citations

169 A.D.3d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
91 N.Y.S.3d 697