Opinion
2016–02141
01-30-2019
PEOPLE of State of New York, Respondent, v. Todd LUMPKIN, also known as Todd Lumpkins, Appellant.
Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Meredith S. Holt of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Jill A. Gross–Marks of counsel), for respondent.
Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Meredith S. Holt of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Jill A. Gross–Marks of counsel), for respondent.
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MARK C. DILLON, HECTOR D. LASALLE, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Correction Law § 168–l(8) provides that a failure by a state or local agency to act or by a court to render a determination within the time period specified by the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6–C; hereinafter SORA) shall not affect the obligation of a sex offender to register or verify under SORA, nor shall such failure prevent a court from making a determination regarding the sex offender's risk level.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the delay in holding a hearing to determine his risk level pursuant to SORA was not so " ‘outrageously arbitrary’ " as to constitute a gross abuse of governmental authority ( People v. Sprinkler, 162 A.D.3d 802, 802, 79 N.Y.S.3d 232, quoting People v. Gonzalez, 138 A.D.3d 814, 815, 29 N.Y.S.3d 542 ; see People v. Gallagher, 129 A.D.3d 1252, 1253, 11 N.Y.S.3d 712 ; People v. Wilkes, 53 A.D.3d 1073, 1074, 862 N.Y.S.2d 232 ; cf. People v. Gregory, 71 A.D.3d 1559, 1560, 897 N.Y.S.2d 665 ).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
SCHEINKMAN, P.J., DILLON, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.