Opinion
No. 127620 (18).
June 30, 2005.
SC: 127620, COA: 258680, Macomb CC: 94-000414-FC.
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and it is DISMISSED, because defendant could have filed an application for leave to appeal the order of the Court of Appeals. MCR 3.302(D)(2); MCR 7.304(A). The motion to hold this case in abeyance is DENIED.