Defendant and his cohort were running in the street two blocks away from the reported crime scene and looking behind them as they ran, although no one appeared to be chasing them. These circumstances provided the police with reasonable suspicion that defendant and his cohort might have committed the crime (People v. Lugo, 179 A.D.2d 565, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 949), and justified the minimal intrusion in asking them to stop (People v. Martinez, 80 N.Y.2d 444; see also, People v. Hicks, 68 N.Y.2d 234). Nor was the show-up identification of defendant by one of the victims unduly suggestive. Indeed, the two men were captured in the immediate vicinity of the crime scene and viewed by the witness within moments (see, People v. Riley, 70 N.Y.2d 523). The record also supports the hearing court's finding that the witness's observation of defendant during the crime provided her with an independent source for the identification (see, People v Hill, 161 A.D.2d 478, 479).