From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PEOPLE v. LUGO

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2003
766 N.Y.S.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-00286, 2001-00288, 2001-00794

Submitted August 29, 2003.

October 20, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from three sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosenzweig, J.), all imposed January 3, 2001, on the ground that the sentences are excessive.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (James A. Dolan of counsel; Douglas P. Duzant on the memorandum), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., ANITA R. FLORIO, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, HOWARD MILLER, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed. No opinion.

PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, KRAUSMAN, H. MILLER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

PEOPLE v. LUGO

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2003
766 N.Y.S.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

PEOPLE v. LUGO

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. JAMES LUGO, a/k/a PERCY D'AMIL, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 2003

Citations

766 N.Y.S.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)