From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lucynski

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 6, 2021
964 N.W.2d 571 (Mich. 2021)

Opinion

SC: 162833 COA: 353646

10-06-2021

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Allan LUCYNSKI, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the issues: (1) whether the defendant impeded traffic, in violation of MCL 257.676b(1), where there was no actual traffic to impede at that time; (2) if not, whether the deputy sheriff made a reasonable mistake of law by effectuating a traffic stop of the defendant for violating MCL 257.676b(1), see Heien v. North Carolina , 574 U.S. 54, 135 S.Ct. 530, 190 L.Ed.2d 475 (2014) ; and (3) whether the deputy sheriff seized the defendant when he pulled his patrol vehicle behind the defendant's vehicle in a driveway. The appellant's brief and appendix shall be filed by January 31, 2022, with no extensions except upon a showing of good cause. The time for filing the remaining briefs shall be set as forth in MCR 7.312(E). The time allowed for oral argument shall be 20 minutes for each side. MCR 7.314(B)(1).

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

People v. Lucynski

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 6, 2021
964 N.W.2d 571 (Mich. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Lucynski

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Allan…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Oct 6, 2021

Citations

964 N.W.2d 571 (Mich. 2021)

Citing Cases

People v. Lucynski

(1) whether the defendant impeded traffic, in violation of MCL 257.676b(1), where there was no actual traffic…