From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lucas

Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 2023
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 6672 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

No. 973 KA 22-00343

12-22-2023

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. AARON LUCAS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (NICHOLAS P. DIFONZO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MINDY F. VANLEUVAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (NICHOLAS P. DIFONZO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MINDY F. VANLEUVAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CURRAN, MONTOUR, GREENWOOD, AND NOWAK, JJ.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boller, A.J.), rendered June 29, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of rape in the first degree (two counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of two counts of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [1]). We agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because Supreme Court's "oral colloquy mischaracterized it as an absolute bar to the taking of an appeal" (People v McCrayer, 199 A.D.3d 1401, 1401 [4th Dept 2021]; see People v Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 565-566 [2019], cert denied ___ U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct. 2634 [2020]; People v Schlifke, 210 A.D.3d 1518, 1518 [4th Dept 2022], lv denied 39 N.Y.3d 1080 [2023]). Although the record establishes that defendant executed a written waiver of the right to appeal, the written waiver does not cure the deficient oral colloquy because the court did not inquire of defendant whether he understood the written waiver or whether he had read the waiver before signing it (see People v Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 262, 267 [2011]; People v Mobayed, 158 A.D.3d 1221, 1222 [4th Dept 2018], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 1015 [2018]; People v Sanford, 138 A.D.3d 1435, 1436 [4th Dept 2016]). We nevertheless reject defendant's contention that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe.


Summaries of

People v. Lucas

Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 2023
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 6672 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

People v. Lucas

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. AARON LUCAS…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 22, 2023

Citations

2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 6672 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)