From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lozano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 10, 2001
282 A.D.2d 242 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

April 10, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Kahn, J.), rendered March 10, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first and third degrees and criminal use of drug paraphernalia in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 15 years to life, 4/12; to 9 years and 1 year, unanimously affirmed.

Christopher Sanders, for Respondent

Elon Harpaz, for Defendant-Appellant

Sullivan, P.J., Williams, Andrias, Rubin, Friedman, JJ.


The court properly refused to submit to the jury the lesser included offense of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, the only such offense requested by defendant, since there was no reasonable view of the evidence to warrant such a submission (see, People v. Scarborough, 49 N.Y.2d 364). Moreover, the jury's verdict on the paraphernalia count establishes that it rejected the factual theory under which defendant sought submission of seventh-degree possession (see,People v. Ruiz, 223 A.D.2d 418, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 853).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Lozano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 10, 2001
282 A.D.2d 242 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Lozano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT v. GENARO LOZANO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 10, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 242 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 859

Citing Cases

People v. Raosto

However, under the facts presented, if the People failed to prove that defendant was part of the drug-selling…