From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lowe

Court of Appeal of California
Apr 25, 2007
H029623 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 25, 2007)

Opinion

H029623

4-25-2007

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JULIAN LOWE, Defendant and Appellant.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED


ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING JUDGMENT CHANGED

It is hereby ordered that the opinion herein, filed on March 29, 2007, be modified as follows:

On page 1, second paragraph, modify the fifth sentence beginning "Accordingly, we modify the judgment . . . "as follows: "Accordingly, we modify the judgment to stay the sentences imposed on account of one of the two robberies defendant committed."

On page 10, first full paragraph modify the second sentence beginning "The People agree . . ." as follows: "The People agree with defendant that one of the two robbery sentences, and its attendant enhancement, should be stayed, but argue that the other should not."

On page 13, line four, delete footnote 3, and add the following sentence and citation: "Furthermore, when "the base term of a sentence is stayed under section 654, the attendant enhancements must also be stayed." (People v. Bracamonte (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 704, 709.)"

On page 14, under the heading "DISPOSITION" replace the first sentence beginning "The judgment is modified as follows . . . " with the following: "The judgment is modified as follows: the sentences on count 3 for robbery, and for the weapon enhancement on that count, are stayed pursuant to Penal Code section 654."

The modification effects a change in the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

Duffy, J.

Bamattre-Manoukian, Acting P. J.

Mihara, J.


Summaries of

People v. Lowe

Court of Appeal of California
Apr 25, 2007
H029623 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 25, 2007)
Case details for

People v. Lowe

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JULIAN LOWE, Defendant and…

Court:Court of Appeal of California

Date published: Apr 25, 2007

Citations

H029623 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 25, 2007)