From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lourens, McIlwain, Richards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 22, 1993
198 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 22, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, those branches of the omnibus motions of the defendants Marie Lourens, John McIlwain, and Charles Richards which were to suppress physical evidence are denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

We agree with the People that the defendants failed to establish a reasonable expectation of privacy in the property that was the subject of the search. Therefore, the defendants are without standing to contest the validity of that search and the resulting seizure of physical evidence found inside a safe (see, People v Tejada, 81 N.Y.2d 861; People v Wesley, 73 N.Y.2d 351; People v Ponder, 54 N.Y.2d 160). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Miller and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lourens, McIlwain, Richards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 22, 1993
198 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Lourens, McIlwain, Richards

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. MARIE LOURENS, JOHN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 22, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 910

Citing Cases

People v. Richards

Since the People's case against the defendant was wholly circumstantial and far from overwhelming, the…