Opinion
November 25, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pesce, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
Defendant's challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution was not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (see, CPL 470.05; People v Hoke, 62 N.Y.2d 1022; People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636). Moreover, were we to review this issue in the interest of justice, vacatur would not be warranted because the record discloses that the plea was knowing and voluntary and the allocution satisfied the requirements of People v Harris ( 61 N.Y.2d 9).
There is no merit to defendant's claim that his sentence was harsh and excessive. Defendant received the bargained-for sentence of concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years' incarceration for each count (see, People v Carrisquello, 106 A.D.2d 513; People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816), and, as a second violent felony offender, defendant was sentenced to the minimum authorized term on the weapons count (Penal Law § 70.04 [d]; [4]). Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.