Opinion
November 18, 1985
Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
The record supports the denial of defendant's motion to suppress his confession, as it was made after he knowingly and intelligently waived his Miranda rights. The record is devoid of any indication of coercive behavior on the part of the police (cf. People v Anderson, 42 N.Y.2d 35).
As defendant had never previously raised the other arguments he is presently asserting regarding the admissibility of his confession and whether he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in his acquaintance's home where he was arrested, these issues have not been preserved for review as a matter of law (see, People v Tutt, 38 N.Y.2d 1011; People v Smith, 108 A.D.2d 763; People v Jones, 81 A.D.2d 22). We decline to address them in the interest of justice. O'Connor, J.P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.