From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lora

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 16, 1991
176 A.D.2d 273 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

September 16, 1991

Appeal from the County Court, Dutchess County (King, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered a plea of guilty under a negotiated plea agreement with the understanding that he was to receive the sentence imposed. Therefore, he may not now be heard to complain that the sentence was excessive (see, People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816).

Having previously denied the defendant's application, for leave to appeal from the order denying his motion, pursuant to CPL 440.10, to vacate the judgment of conviction, his present challenge to that order on the same grounds is not properly before us. Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lora

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 16, 1991
176 A.D.2d 273 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Lora

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JESUS LORA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 16, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 273 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

People v. Watson

The defendant never raised this claim of duplicitousness in the Supreme Court, so it is not preserved for…

People v. Harrison

15 [4] ), combined with the trial testimony concerning her intent to use the weapon unlawfully against a…