From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lora

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 1990
162 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

June 25, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.).


Ordered that the amended judgment is reversed, the sentence is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

The defendant argues, and the People concede, that the sentence must be vacated. We agree. There was no hearing held prior to the court's decision to revoke the defendant's sentence of probation. CPL 410.70 provides that a court may not revoke a sentence of probation unless the court has found that the defendant has violated a condition of the sentence and the defendant has had an opportunity to be heard. Therefore this matter must be remitted for a revocation hearing pursuant to CPL 410.70. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lora

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 1990
162 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Lora

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS LORA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 25, 1990

Citations

162 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

People v. Montenegro

A court may not revoke a sentence of probation without finding that the defendant has violated a condition of…

People v. Montenegro

A court may not revoke a sentence of probation without finding that the defendant has violated a condition of…