From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lopez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 20, 2003
305 A.D.2d 269 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1195

May 20, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James Yates, J.), rendered September 21, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree and possession of burglar's tools, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 17 years to life and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Madeleine Guilmain, for respondent.

Robin Nichinsky, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Ellerin, Williams, JJ.


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). The evidence established that defendant entered the apartment building in question unlawfully, and that he did so with intent to commit a crime in that building. The fact that the jury acquitted defendant of other charges, and reached yet another verdict as to the codefendant, does not warrant a different result (see People v. Rayam, 94 N.Y.2d 557).

Defendant's challenges to the People's summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the challenged remarks constituted fair comment on the evidence, and reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, in response to defense arguments, and that the summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 976; People v. D'Alessandro, 184 A.D.2d 114, 118-119, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 884).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Given defendant's extensive criminal record, his 17 years to life sentence was not unconstitutional as applied ( see Ewing v. California, ___ US ___, 123 S.Ct. 1179; People v. Thompson, 83 N.Y.2d 477).

Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Lopez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 20, 2003
305 A.D.2d 269 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PABLO LOPEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 20, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 269 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
759 N.Y.S.2d 320