From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lopez

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Nov 15, 2023
315 Cal. Rptr. 3d 17 (Cal. 2023)

Opinion

S281488

11-15-2023

PEOPLE v. LOPEZ


The petition for review is granted.

The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: Is defendant entitled to retroactive application of Assembly Bill No. 333 (2021-2022 Reg. Sess.) where he appeals for a second time after his judgment was conditionally reversed and the Court of Appeal issued a limited remand to the trial court to address sentencing issues?

Pending review, the opinion of the Court of Appeal, which is currently published at 93 Cal.App.5th 1110, 311 Cal.Rptr.3d 515, may be cited, not only for its persuasive value, but also for the limited purpose of establishing the existence of a conflict in authority that would in turn allow trial courts to exercise discretion under Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 456, 20 Cal.Rptr. 321, 369 P.2d 937, to choose between sides of any such conflict. (See Standing Order Exercising Authority Under California Rules of Court, Rule 8.1115(e)(3), Upon Grant of Review or Transfer of a Matter with an Underlying Published Court of Appeal Opinion, Administrative Order 2021-04-21; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(e)(3) and corresponding Comment, par. 2.)

The request for an order directing depublication of the opinion is denied.

Votes: Guerrero, C.J., Corrigan, Liu, Kruger, Groban, Jenkins and Evans, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Lopez

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Nov 15, 2023
315 Cal. Rptr. 3d 17 (Cal. 2023)
Case details for

People v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. LOPEZ (OSCAR)

Court:California Supreme Court(Minute Order)

Date published: Nov 15, 2023

Citations

315 Cal. Rptr. 3d 17 (Cal. 2023)
537 P.3d 1152

Citing Cases

People v. Torres

Our Supreme Court has limited review in Lopez to the question of whether the defendant is entitled to…

People v. Mancilla

Our Supreme Court has limited review in Lopez to the question of whether the defendant is entitled to…