From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lopez

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Jul 16, 2021
No. 2021-04449 (N.Y. App. Div. Jul. 16, 2021)

Opinion

2021-04449

07-16-2021

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH LOPEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (DEBORAH K. JESSEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ASHLEY R. LOWRY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (DEBORAH K. JESSEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ASHLEY R. LOWRY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered August 14, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of attempted course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree (two counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of attempted course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.75 [1] [a]). We affirm.

Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid (see generally People v Goins, 191 A.D.3d 1399, 1399 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 36 N.Y.3d 1120 [2021]), we reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court erred in refusing to suppress certain statements that defendant made to the police (see People v Crane, 87 A.D.3d 1386, 1387 [4th Dept 2011], lv denied 17 N.Y.3d 952 [2011]).

We also reject defendant's contention that the court abused its discretion in refusing to grant him youthful offender status (see People v Simpson, 182 A.D.3d 1046, 1047 [4th Dept 2020], lv denied 35 N.Y.3d 1049 [2020]). Additionally, having reviewed the applicable factors pertinent to a youthful offender adjudication (see People v Keith B.J., 158 A.D.3d 1160, 1160 [4th Dept 2018]), we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to grant him such status (see Simpson, 182 A.D.3d at 1047). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.


Summaries of

People v. Lopez

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Jul 16, 2021
No. 2021-04449 (N.Y. App. Div. Jul. 16, 2021)
Case details for

People v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH LOPEZ…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 16, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-04449 (N.Y. App. Div. Jul. 16, 2021)