Opinion
March 13, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the prompt curative action of the trial court minimized any prejudicial effect of the prosecution witnesses' inadvertent and indirect references to photographs (see, People v. Windley, 181 A.D.2d 703; People v Green, 143 A.D.2d 768).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Narayan, 54 N.Y.2d 106), or do not warrant reversal. Sullivan, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.