Opinion
C073261
10-29-2013
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT ALLEN LONG, Defendant and Appellant.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
(Super. Ct. No. CM037269)
Appointed counsel for defendant Robert Allen Long asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment.
I
Defendant was arrested after he supplied a parole officer with a "false" urine sample during a parole search of defendant's residence. One-half gram of methamphetamine was removed from defendant's pocket.
Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to possession of methamphetamine and admitted a prior serious felony conviction for the limited purpose of excluding him from serving his sentence in county jail. The trial court sentenced defendant to three years in state prison, awarded 201 days of presentence credit (101 actual days and 100 conduct days), and imposed various fines and fees.
II
Appointed counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and asking this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed and we received no communication from defendant.
Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
MAURO, J. We concur: BLEASE, Acting P. J. DUARTE, J.