From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Logan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1910
92 N.E. 1095 (N.Y. 1910)

Opinion

Argued March 2, 1910

Decided March 22, 1910

D.E. Brong for appellant.

Fred M. Ackerson for respondent.


Judgment of conviction reversed and new trial ordered, on the ground of the error in requiring, over objection and exception, the defendant to testify that he had commenced a civil action for false arrest; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT and HISCOCK, JJ. Dissenting: GRAY and EDWARD T. BARTLETT, JJ. Absent: CHASE, J.


Summaries of

People v. Logan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1910
92 N.E. 1095 (N.Y. 1910)
Case details for

People v. Logan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . ARTHUR LOGAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 22, 1910

Citations

92 N.E. 1095 (N.Y. 1910)
92 N.E. 1095