Opinion
Argued March 2, 1910
Decided March 22, 1910
D.E. Brong for appellant.
Fred M. Ackerson for respondent.
Judgment of conviction reversed and new trial ordered, on the ground of the error in requiring, over objection and exception, the defendant to testify that he had commenced a civil action for false arrest; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT and HISCOCK, JJ. Dissenting: GRAY and EDWARD T. BARTLETT, JJ. Absent: CHASE, J.