From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lloyd

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 15, 1977
371 N.E.2d 790 (N.Y. 1977)

Summary

In Lloyd, the sale similarly occurred in the presence of informants and the defendant took the stand and asserted an alibi.

Summary of this case from People v. Baez

Opinion

Argued October 4, 1977

Decided November 15, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, RAYMOND HARRINGTON, J.

Harry D. Hersh, James J. McDonough and Matthew Muraskin for appellant.

Denis Dillon, District Attorney (Judith K. Rubinstein and William C. Donnino of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed. On the record here, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's application, made at the commencement of the trial, for disclosure of the identities of the two informers (People v Pena, 37 N.Y.2d 642; see, also, People v Lee, 39 N.Y.2d 388; People v Colon, 39 N.Y.2d 872; People v Goggins, 34 N.Y.2d 163, cert den 419 U.S. 1012).

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Lloyd

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 15, 1977
371 N.E.2d 790 (N.Y. 1977)

In Lloyd, the sale similarly occurred in the presence of informants and the defendant took the stand and asserted an alibi.

Summary of this case from People v. Baez
Case details for

People v. Lloyd

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LORETTA LLOYD…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 15, 1977

Citations

371 N.E.2d 790 (N.Y. 1977)
371 N.E.2d 790
401 N.Y.S.2d 27

Citing Cases

People v. Baez

Unlike the situations in People v. Martinez ( 79 A.D.2d 661, affd 54 N.Y.2d 723) and People v. Colon ( 39…

People v. Yattaw

There was also a complete rejection, with explanation, of the individual with whom defendant was attempting…