From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lloyd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 21, 1997
241 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

July 21, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention regarding the legal sufficiency of the evidence adduced at trial is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Bynum, 70 N.Y.2d 858; People v. Pinder, 199 A.D.2d 544; People v. Coico, 176 A.D.2d 339). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

O'Brien, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lloyd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 21, 1997
241 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Lloyd

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LAWRENCE LLOYD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 21, 1997

Citations

241 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 990