From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Llorente

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1985
115 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

December 2, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lawrence, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Defendant failed to properly preserve for appellate review the issue as to the sufficiency of his plea allocution (see, People v Hoke, 62 N.Y.2d 1022; People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Gonzalez, 110 A.D.2d 909).

In any event, defendant's allocution established the requisite elements of manslaughter in the first degree (see, People v McGowen, 42 N.Y.2d 905; People v Clairborne, 29 N.Y.2d 950). Even assuming, arguendo, that the factual recitation was somewhat incomplete, defendant's plea is not deficient as it appears from the record that the court made a diligent and thorough inquiry and that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently pleaded guilty (see, People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9; People v Johnson, 107 A.D.2d 713). Furthermore, the bargained-for guilty plea to the lesser charge makes unnecessary a factual basis for the particular crime charged (see, People v Clairborne, supra, at p. 951; People v Wedgewood, 106 A.D.2d 674, 676; People v Price, 105 A.D.2d 557, 558). Finally, under the circumstances of this case, the sentence imposed was not excessive. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Llorente

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1985
115 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Llorente

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALBERTO LLORENTE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1985

Citations

115 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Meadows

The defendant had not preserved that issue as a matter of law. A claim of inadequacy of a factual recitation…