From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lleras

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 15, 2016
140 A.D.3d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

06-15-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Victor LLERAS, appellant.

Arleen Lewis, Blauvelt, N.Y., for appellant. Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel), for respondent.


Arleen Lewis, Blauvelt, N.Y., for appellant.

Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered January 7, 2015, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contentions on appeal relate to his pretrial suppression motion. However, by pleading guilty before the County Court rendered a decision on his suppression motion, the defendant forfeited his right to appellate review of his contentions relating to that motion (see People v. Fernandez, 67 N.Y.2d 686, 688, 499 N.Y.S.2d 919, 490 N.E.2d 838 ; People v. Russell, 128 A.D.3d 1383, 1384, 7 N.Y.S.3d 790 ; People v. Rodriguez, 118 A.D.3d 1182, 987 N.Y.S.2d 264 ; People v. Barton, 113 A.D.3d 927, 928, 978 N.Y.S.2d 446 ; People v. Carter, 304 A.D.2d 771, 757 N.Y.S.2d 776 ).

CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, AUSTIN and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lleras

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 15, 2016
140 A.D.3d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Lleras

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Victor LLERAS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 15, 2016

Citations

140 A.D.3d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4734
32 N.Y.S.3d 510

Citing Cases

People v. Sadiku

However, in fact, the record contains an order by Judge Drysdale, dated April 25, 2017, the same day that…

People v. Harris

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.Under the circumstances presented, the defendant's contention that a…