From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Livingston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 16, 2011
87 A.D.3d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010-06673.

Decided on August 16, 2011.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), dated May 25, 2010, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Harold, Salant, Strassfield Spielberg, White Plains, N.Y. (Rachel J. Filasto of counsel), for appellant.

Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Lori A. Alesio, Laurie Sapakoff, and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Covello, Florio and Lott, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court's order adequately sets forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which its determination was based ( see Correction Law § 168-n; cf. People v Burke, 68 AD3d 1175, 1176). Moreover, the record on appeal permits meaningful appellate review of the propriety of the Supreme Court's risk-level determination.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant was not entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive risk-level assessment and, thus, he was properly designated a level three sex offender ( see People v Smith, 85 AD3d 891; People v Sivells, 83 AD3d 1027; People v Bussie, 83 AD3d 920, lv denied 17 NY3d 704).


Summaries of

People v. Livingston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 16, 2011
87 A.D.3d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Livingston

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CURTIS LIVINGSTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 16, 2011

Citations

87 A.D.3d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 6256
928 N.Y.S.2d 473