Opinion
C084948
11-21-2017
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PATRICK JAMES LITTEK, Defendant and Appellant.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Super. Ct. No. TF16000332B)
In exchange for a stipulated sentence, defendant pled no contest to attempting to manufacture concentrated marijuana. As specified in his plea form, "defendant attempted to manufacture [butane honey oil] by possessing the parts required for a lab."
Defendant said on his plea form that his plea was pursuant to People v. West (1970) 3 Cal.3d 595. He also admitted to violating probation.
Carrying out the terms of the plea, the trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on four years' formal probation. It ordered him to serve 180 days in jail and awarded five days of credit (3 actual; 2 conduct). The court also imposed various fines and fees. As to the probation violation, the court reinstated probation on the terms previously imposed.
Defendant timely appealed. His request for a certificate of probable cause was denied.
DISCUSSION
Counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and requests that we review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant.
Having examined the record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
/s/_________
Robie, J. We concur: /s/_________
Raye, P. J. /s/_________
Murray, J.