From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Liranzo-Marte

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 31, 2016
137 A.D.3d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

03-31-2016

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Johan LIRANZO–MARTE, Defendant–Appellant.

Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Alejandro B. Fernandez of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (John T. Hughes of counsel), for respondent.


Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Alejandro B. Fernandez of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (John T. Hughes of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered April 26, 2012,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

TOM, J.P., SWEENY, MANZANET–DANIELS, GISCHE, GESMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Liranzo-Marte

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 31, 2016
137 A.D.3d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Liranzo-Marte

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Johan LIRANZO–MARTE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 31, 2016

Citations

137 A.D.3d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2546
27 N.Y.S.3d 388