From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Linz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 1998
256 A.D.2d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 14, 1998

Appeal from the a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Mackston, J.).


Ordered that the judgment and the resentence are affirmed.

Despite his assertions to the contrary, the defendant was competent at the time that he entered his plea of guilty ( see, CPL 730.10; People v. Rowley, 222 A.D.2d 718).

Under the circumstances of this case, the court properly denied suppression of the defendant's statements to law enforcement officials ( see, People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761).

The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or relate to matters dehors the record.

Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Linz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 1998
256 A.D.2d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Linz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RUSSELL LINZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
682 N.Y.S.2d 618