From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Linwood

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District. Affirmed in part and reversed in part
Apr 13, 1993
616 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993)

Opinion

No. 3-92-0392

Opinion filed April 13, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria County; the Hon. Robert Manning, Judge, presiding.

Edwin J. Anderson, of State Appellate Defender's Office, of Mt. Vernon, for appellant.

Kevin W. Lyons, State's Attorney, of Peoria (John X. Breslin and Terry A. Mertel, both of State's Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor's Office, of counsel), for the People.


The defendant, Robert D. Linwood, was convicted of armed violence, unlawful use of weapons by a felon, and unlawful possession of a controlled substance ( 720 ILCS 5/33A-2, 24-1.1, 570/402 (West 1992)). The court found that the controlled substance conviction merged with the armed violence charge. The defendant was subsequently sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment for armed violence and a concurrent extended 10-year term of imprisonment for unlawful use of weapons.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the court erred in imposing an extended term for unlawful use of weapons by a felon.

The record shows that the defendant did not object to the extended-term sentence at the sentencing hearing, nor did he raise the issue in a motion to reduce sentence. As a result, the State argues that the defendant has waived any objection to the sentence.

An extended-term sentence may only be imposed for the most serious class of offenses for which the defendant was convicted. ( 730 ILCS 5/5-8-2(a) (West 1992); People v. Jordan (1984), 103 Ill.2d 192, 469 N.E.2d 569.) Moreover, when a sentence greater than that permitted by statute is imposed, the excess portion of that sentence is void. ( People v. Mapps (1990), 198 Ill. App.3d 521, 555 N.E.2d 1275.) A void judgment may be attacked at any time. People v. Perruquet (1989), 181 Ill. App.3d 660, 537 N.E.2d 351.

In the instant case, the defendant was convicted of Class X armed violence and Class 3 unlawful use of weapons by a felon ( 720 ILCS 5/24-1.1(d), 33A-3 (West 1992)). Since unlawful use of weapons is the less serious offense, he should not have received an extended term on that count. Moreover, since the excess part of the sentence is void, the error was not waived. Accordingly, we reduce the sentence for unlawful use of weapons to a concurrent term of five years' imprisonment. See People v. Phillips (1987), 159 Ill. App.3d 483, 511 N.E.2d 1193.

The judgment of the circuit court of Peoria County is reversed in part and otherwise affirmed.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

McCUSKEY, P.J., and STOUDER, J., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Linwood

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District. Affirmed in part and reversed in part
Apr 13, 1993
616 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Linwood

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBERT D…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District. Affirmed in part and reversed in part

Date published: Apr 13, 1993

Citations

616 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993)
616 N.E.2d 1

Citing Cases

People v. Muntaner

When a sentence greater than that authorized by statute is imposed, the excess portion of that sentence is…