From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1986
121 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

June 9, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County, Ryan, J., Marano, J.


Judgments affirmed.

The complaining witness's chance viewing of the defendant in the street without any police present was not an identification procedure (see, People v. Dukes, 97 A.D.2d 445), and the witness's in-court identification of the defendant was properly admitted at trial. The defendant's other contentions are either unpreserved (see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636), or without merit (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621). Lazer, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1986
121 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Lino

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GILBERT LINO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1986

Citations

121 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Motayne

The Supreme Court did not err in denying the defendant's challenge for cause to a prospective juror, made on…

People v. Motayne

The Supreme Court did not err in denying the defendant's challenge for cause to a prospective juror, made on…