From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lightfoot

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 3, 2014
123 A.D.3d 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

12-03-2014

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jermaine LIGHTFOOT, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Paul Skip Laisure of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Johnnette Traill of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Paul Skip Laisure of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Johnnette Traill of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Mullings, J.), imposed June 28, 2012, upon his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ), and thus does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., MASTRO, DICKERSON and LEVENTHAL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lightfoot

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 3, 2014
123 A.D.3d 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Lightfoot

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jermaine LIGHTFOOT, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 3, 2014

Citations

123 A.D.3d 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
123 A.D.3d 739
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8458