From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lieberman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

May, 1936.

Appeal from County Court of Rockland County.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.


The record amply supports the conviction and we find no prejudicial error. The sentence, however, was not legal in so far as concerned the minimum thereof. It gave no effect to section 2189 of the Penal Law, which provides that the minimum, where the person sentenced has not previously been convicted, shall not be more than one-half the longest period fixed by law for which the crime is punishable. Here the greatest minimum period that might be imposed was fifteen years instead of twenty years. Pursuant to section 543 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the judgment of the County Court of Rockland county is modified by providing that defendant is sentenced to an indeterminate term of not less than fifteen years and not more than thirty years with an additional five-year term, making the minimum twenty years and the maximum thirty-five years. As so modified the judgment and the order are unanimously affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Lieberman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

People v. Lieberman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BENJAMIN LIEBERMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

People v. Hilt

This computation is determined by taking the longest period prescribed for robbery in the first degree, which…

People v. Wiley

The sentence, however, was not legal in so far as it concerned the minimum thereof. ( People v. Lieberman,…