Opinion
March 27, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's identity beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v. Caballero, 177 A.D.2d 496; People v. Dixon, 158 A.D.2d 467; People v. Neese, 138 A.D.2d 531). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).
The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either without merit or do not require reversal. Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Lawrence and Florio, JJ., concur.