From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 6, 1999
261 A.D.2d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 6, 1999

Appeal from the County Court of Chemung County (Castellino, J.).


Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and was sentenced to a prison term of 2 to 4 years. On appeal, she contends, inter alia, that CPL 410.91, which creates a sentencing option of parole supervision for a defendant with a history of controlled substance dependence, deprives her of equal protection of the law because she is not a drug-dependent individual. We rejected this argument in People v. Kinch ( 237 A.D.2d 830, 831, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 860), wherein we observed that: "In view of the current nationwide drug crisis and the criminal conduct engendered thereby, it cannot be seriously argued that legislation targeting drug-dependent individuals and providing for intensive drug treatment in lieu of incarceration does not bear a reasonable relationship to some legitimate legislative objective" (id., at 831). Therefore, we find defendant's equal protection challenge to be without merit. Defendant's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be unpersuasive.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Peters and Graffeo, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 6, 1999
261 A.D.2d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KATRESE LEWIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 6, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
690 N.Y.S.2d 294

Citing Cases

People v. Ralston

"The claimed deficiencies in counsel's performance do not undercut the conclusion that defendant * * *…