Opinion
388 KA 13-01451.
04-29-2016
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael S. LEWIS, Defendant–Appellant.
Leanne Lapp, Public Defender, Canandaigua (Jon P. Getz of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. R. Michael Tantillo, District Attorney, Canandaigua (James B. Ritts of Counsel), for Respondent.
Leanne Lapp, Public Defender, Canandaigua (Jon P. Getz of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant.
R. Michael Tantillo, District Attorney, Canandaigua (James B. Ritts of Counsel), for Respondent.
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM: On appeal from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of, inter alia, eight counts of predatory sexual assault against a child (Penal Law § 130.96 ), defendant contends that County Court failed to apprehend its power to exercise its discretion in submitting representative counts to the jury inasmuch as the court allowed the prosecutor to select the counts to submit (see generally CPL 300.40[6][b] ). Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's contention is preserved for our review, we nevertheless reject it. The record establishes that the court engaged in lengthy and detailed discussions with both the prosecutor and defense counsel before determining which counts would be submitted to the jury.
Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction of counts seven and eight of the indictment (see People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10, 19, 629 N.Y.S.2d 173, 652 N.E.2d 919 ). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 ), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 ). We reject defendant's further contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel (see generally People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400 ). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.