From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Leeper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 1998
254 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 2, 1998

Appeal from Judgment of Chautauqua County Court, Ward, J. — Assault, 1st Degree.

Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted upon a plea of guilty of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10) in full satisfaction of a four-count indictment charging defendant, inter alia, with attempted murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 110.00, 125.25 Penal [1]). We reject the contention of defendant that, because his assigned counsel failed to make pretrial motions, he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Defendant has not shown that the motions, if made, would have been successful and has failed to establish that counsel otherwise failed to provide meaningful representation ( see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147; People v. Ayala, 236 A.D.2d 802, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 855).


Summaries of

People v. Leeper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 1998
254 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Leeper

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WAYNE E. LEEPER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 2, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 554

Citing Cases

People v. Willis

Counsel's failure to make pretrial motions generally does not by itself establish ineffective assistance of…

People v. Hill

Contrary to the contention of defendant, he received effective assistance of counsel. Defendant failed to…