Opinion
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County No. BA345357, Craig E. Veals, Judge.
Linn Davis, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
MANELLA, J.
Tyson Lee appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of possession of ammunition by a felon (Pen. Code, § 12316, subd. (b)(1)) and admitted that he served a prior prison term within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b). He was sentenced to prison for 28 months, consisting of the low term of 16 months, plus one year for the prior prison term enhancement.
The evidence at trial established that on August 4, 2008, parole agent Alfred Perez conducted a parole search at appellant’s residence in Los Angeles and found a box of live ammunition for a 45-caliber handgun in a computer bag. The box held 50 rounds of ammunition and eight rounds were missing. Appellant stated the missing rounds were with “the gun” and that no gun was in the apartment. It was stipulated that appellant was previously convicted of attempted extortion in violation of Penal Code section 524.
Appellant’s motion for a mistrial was denied, as was his motion for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Penal Code section 1118.1.
After review of the record, appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed an opening brief requesting this court to independently review the record pursuant to the holding of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.
On July 15, 2009, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. No response has been received to date.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that no arguable issues exist, and that appellant has, by virtue of counsel’s compliance with the Wende procedure and our review of the record, received adequate and effective appellate review of the judgment entered against him in this case. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 278; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 112-113.)
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
We concur: WILLHITE, Acting P.J., SUZUKAWA, J.